25 7.RI.8 RI.7.8 ELAGSE7RI8 7.RI.IKI.8 7.11* 7.11.A* 7.11.B* 7R8 R.7.8 CC.1.2.7.h E07.B-C.3.1.1 7.RC.15.RI 7.T.T.3.a 7.CD.3.1

Persuasive Arguments and Claims 7th Grade

Alabama Course of Study Standards: 25
Determine the intended purposes of techniques used for rhetorical effect in multiple digital sources.
Arizona's K-12 Academic Standards: 7.RI.8 Common Core State Standards: Literacy.RI.7.8 Georgia Standards: ELAGSE7RI8
Trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient to support the claims.
Tennessee Academic Standards: 7.RI.IKI.8
Trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the evidence is relevant and sufficient to support the claims.
Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS): 7.11*
Students analyze, make inferences and draw conclusions about persuasive text and provide evidence from text to support their analysis.
Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS): 7.11.A*
analyze the structure of the central argument in contemporary policy speeches (e.g., argument by cause and effect, analogy, authority) and identify the different types of evidence used to support the argument;
Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS): 7.11.B*
identify such rhetorical fallacies as ad hominem, exaggeration, stereotyping, or categorical claims in persuasive texts.
Pennsylvania Core Standards: CC.1.2.7.h
Evaluate an author’s argument, reasoning, and specific claims for the soundness of the argument and the relevance of the evidence.
Pennsylvania Core Standards: E07.B-C.3.1.1
Trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient to support the claims.
Arkansas Academic Standards: 7.RC.15.RI
Evaluate the argument and supporting claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is logical and if the evidence is relevant and sufficient to support the claims.
Georgia Standards: 7.T.T.3.a
Analyze argumentative techniques used to present and design content, including an author’s claim, supporting relevant evidence, an identified counterclaim, and a conclusion that logically follows the argument. (I)
North Carolina - Standard Course of Study: 7.CD.3.1
Evaluate the argument of multiple texts including the soundness of reasoning or specific claims, and the relevance of evidence.

Persuasive Arguments and Claims

Alabama Course of Study Standards: 25

Determine the intended purposes of techniques used for rhetorical effect in multiple digital sources.

Arizona's K-12 Academic Standards: 7.RI.8

Common Core State Standards: Literacy.RI.7.8

Georgia Standards: ELAGSE7RI8

Trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient to support the claims.

Tennessee Academic Standards: 7.RI.IKI.8

Trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the evidence is relevant and sufficient to support the claims.

Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS): 7.11*

Students analyze, make inferences and draw conclusions about persuasive text and provide evidence from text to support their analysis.

Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS): 7.11.A*

analyze the structure of the central argument in contemporary policy speeches (e.g., argument by cause and effect, analogy, authority) and identify the different types of evidence used to support the argument;

Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS): 7.11.B*

identify such rhetorical fallacies as ad hominem, exaggeration, stereotyping, or categorical claims in persuasive texts.

Pennsylvania Core Standards: CC.1.2.7.h

Evaluate an author’s argument, reasoning, and specific claims for the soundness of the argument and the relevance of the evidence.

Pennsylvania Core Standards: E07.B-C.3.1.1

Trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient to support the claims.

Arkansas Academic Standards: 7.RC.15.RI

Evaluate the argument and supporting claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is logical and if the evidence is relevant and sufficient to support the claims.

Georgia Standards: 7.T.T.3.a

Analyze argumentative techniques used to present and design content, including an author’s claim, supporting relevant evidence, an identified counterclaim, and a conclusion that logically follows the argument. (I)

North Carolina - Standard Course of Study: 7.CD.3.1

Evaluate the argument of multiple texts including the soundness of reasoning or specific claims, and the relevance of evidence.

Processing Request...