29 RI.8.8 8.RI.8 RI.8.8 ELAGSE8RI8 8R8 8.RI.IKI.8 8.RI.9 RI.8.9 ELAGSE8RI9 RI.8.9 8.RI.IKI.9 CC.1.2.8.H      E08.B-C.3.1.1

Persuasive Arguments and Claims 8th Grade

Alabama Course of Study Standards: 29
Read, analyze, and evaluate texts from science, social studies, and other academic disciplines to determine how those disciplines treat domain-specific vocabulary and content organization.
Arkansas Academic Standards: RI.8.8
Analyze and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; recognize when irrelevant evidence is introduced.
Arizona - K-12 Academic Standards: 8.RI.8 Common Core State Standards: Literacy.RI.8.8 Georgia Standards of Excellence (GSE): ELAGSE8RI8
Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; recognize when irrelevant evidence is introduced.
New York State Next Generation Learning Standards: 8R8
Trace and evaluate an argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient and recognizing when irrelevant evidence is introduced. (RI&RL)
Tennessee Academic Standards: 8.RI.IKI.8
Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether evidence is relevant and sufficient to support the claims and the reasoning is sound.
Arizona - K-12 Academic Standards: 8.RI.9 Common Core State Standards: Literacy.RI.8.9 Georgia Standards of Excellence (GSE): ELAGSE8RI9 Tennessee Academic Standards: 8.RI.IKI.9
Analyze a case in which two or more texts provide conflicting information on the same topic and identify where the texts disagree on matters of fact or interpretation.
New Jersey Student Learning Standards: RI.8.9
Analyze and reflect on (e.g. practical knowledge, historical/cultural context, and background knowledge) two or more texts that provide conflicting information on the same topic and identify where the texts disagree on matters of fact or interpretation.
Pennsylvania Core Standards: CC.1.2.8.H
Evaluate an author’s argument, reasoning, and specific claims for the soundness of the arguments and the relevance of the evidence.
Pennsylvania Core Standards: E08.B-C.3.1.1
Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; recognize when irrelevant evidence is introduced.

Persuasive Arguments and Claims

Alabama Course of Study Standards: 29

Read, analyze, and evaluate texts from science, social studies, and other academic disciplines to determine how those disciplines treat domain-specific vocabulary and content organization.

Arkansas Academic Standards: RI.8.8

Analyze and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; recognize when irrelevant evidence is introduced.

Arizona - K-12 Academic Standards: 8.RI.8

Common Core State Standards: Literacy.RI.8.8

Georgia Standards of Excellence (GSE): ELAGSE8RI8

Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; recognize when irrelevant evidence is introduced.

New York State Next Generation Learning Standards: 8R8

Trace and evaluate an argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient and recognizing when irrelevant evidence is introduced. (RI&RL)

Tennessee Academic Standards: 8.RI.IKI.8

Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether evidence is relevant and sufficient to support the claims and the reasoning is sound.

Arizona - K-12 Academic Standards: 8.RI.9

Common Core State Standards: Literacy.RI.8.9

Georgia Standards of Excellence (GSE): ELAGSE8RI9

Tennessee Academic Standards: 8.RI.IKI.9

Analyze a case in which two or more texts provide conflicting information on the same topic and identify where the texts disagree on matters of fact or interpretation.

New Jersey Student Learning Standards: RI.8.9

Analyze and reflect on (e.g. practical knowledge, historical/cultural context, and background knowledge) two or more texts that provide conflicting information on the same topic and identify where the texts disagree on matters of fact or interpretation.

Pennsylvania Core Standards: CC.1.2.8.H

Evaluate an author’s argument, reasoning, and specific claims for the soundness of the arguments and the relevance of the evidence.

Pennsylvania Core Standards: E08.B-C.3.1.1

Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; recognize when irrelevant evidence is introduced.

Processing Request...